Sphere Medical
2016 results highlight the progress achieved
Update | 28 February 2017
Sphere Medical
2016 results highlight the progress achieved
Update | 28 February 2017
Share this note
The past 12 months mark Sphere Medical’s transition from a promising technology platform into a commercial organisation. The receipt of the CE Mark has been followed by launches of Proxima 4 across several major European markets. An increasing number of hospitals have begun clinical evaluations, and the focus over the coming year is translating these expressions of interest into meaningful sales. Our valuation, based on a three-phase DCF-based model, remains unchanged at £30.2m, equivalent to 21.3p per share.
Year-end: December | 2015 | 2016 | 2017E | 2018E |
Sales (£m) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 |
Adj. PBT (£m) | (6.0) | (5.1) | (6.0) | (5.7) |
Net Income (£m) | (5.5) | (4.5) | (5.5) | (5.3) |
Adj. EPS (p) | (5.3) | (3.2) | (3.8) | (3.6) |
Cash (£m) | 10.0 | 3.2 | 7.2 | 0.9 |
EBITDA (£m) | (6.0) | (5.0) | (5.3) | (4.7) |
Update
28 February 2017
Price (Sterling) | 6.38p |
Market Cap | £9.0m |
Enterprise Value | £5.8m |
Shares in issue | 141.8m |
12 month range | 6.2-15.9p |
Free float | 100% |
Primary exchange | AIM London |
Other exchanges | NA |
Sector | Healthcare |
Company Code | SPHR.L |
Corporate client | Yes |
Company description
Sphere Medical develops and commercialises medical monitoring and diagnostic equipment. Its lead product, Proxima, provides near real-time analysis of blood gases, electrolytes, and metabolites at the patient’s bedside within critical care.
Analysts
Franc Gregori
fgregori@trinitydelta.org
+44 20 3637 5041
Mick Cooper PhD
mcooper@trinitydelta.org
+44 (0) 20 3637 5042
Table of Contents
During 2016 it was the CE Mark grant that represented a turning point for Sphere Medical, as this allowed the launch of the Proxima 4 device across several major European markets. The focus for 2017 will be translating the healthy pipeline of clinical interest into meaningful sales traction. However, the lengthy sales cycle, coupled with further spend on product development, means cash out-flows are still expected until FY18. Our valuation, based on a three-phase DCF model remains unchanged at £30.2m (21.3p a share).
The 2016 results are a useful reminder of the progress that Sphere Medical has made over the past 12 months. Whilst the granting of the CE Mark for the Proxima 4 device in September 2016 was a major highlight, a number of other milestones have also been achieved during the period. These include: improved connectivity with the leading patient data systems; increased the number of clinical evaluations by hospitals; shown the workflow benefits of using Proxima on critically ill, unstable patients; the appointment of distributors in Italy and Spain; posted the first sales in several direct markets in Europe; and established the production facility in St Asaph, North Wales.
Looking ahead to 2017, the major focus will be to establish a solid commercial platform and to gain sales traction. We expect further distribution agreements to be struck, as well as a greater focus on the areas serviced by the direct sales team. On the product front, the statement suggests that Proxima 4+ remains on track, although the expected launch date is unlikely to be announced so as to not hinder uptake of the current version. It is worth noting that our forecast suggest the lengthy sales cycles, coupled with planned development expenditure, results in cash out-flows for the coming years. We remind that we estimate that Sphere Medical will likely have an overall funding requirement during 2017 of £7-8m (ex the Silicon Valley Bank loan of £3m).
Proxima 4 is the latest generation of a proprietary micro-analyser technology platform that accurately and rapidly measures a variety of different blood parameters (including pH, pCO2, pO2, electrolytes and glucose) at the point of care (POC) in near-real time. Proxima 4 represents a major upgrade to the previous generations, with additional functionality (notably glucose analysis) and direct connectivity with hospital information systems (including Conworx and Clinisys), as well as simpler and quicker set-up.
The added features of Proxima 4 (notably the glucose analysis) means its use can be broadened to adult patients undergoing major procedures (such as neuro and cardiac surgery) and in children heavier than 15Kg. Management expects this to result in opportunities for 4 to 5 Proxima 4 systems to be placed per 10 critical care beds. The addition of lactate monitoring and suitability for all paediatric use planned for Proxima 4+ would take it into sepsis, trauma and renal patients as well as general complex surgery and could raise penetration to 5 to 6 units per 10 ITU beds. Exhibit 1 details the commercialisation strategy.
Changing established clinical practise can be a major challenge so Proxima 3 was not only used to fine-tune the commercial version but also to educate opinion leaders in major centres. Over the past two years more than 30 hospital evaluations have been performed, with more than 150 patient connections. These pre-marketing activities have helped create a healthy pipeline of interest and since the Proxima 4 has become available four hospitals have used the system on patients, including with children heavier than 15Kg, and a further 20 have requested evaluations. This interest is expected to increase as the year progresses, but converting awareness and interest into sales requires the support of compelling clinical and economic evidence.
Over the past year a study was performed at the University Hospital, Southampton and presented at the British Association of Critical Care Nurses annual conference (September 16). This examined the work flow impacts of using Proxima in a highly optimised and well-equipped cardiac intensive care unit. A total of 20 patients, 10 on Proxima and 10 using near-patient bench-top blood gas analysers, had an average of 10 measurements each over a 24 hour period. The results showed a statistically significant reduction in the time taken to deliver results (>20%) and delay in start of testing (>50%). Additionally, it showed a reduced time away from the bedside of 3:07 minutes per test. Interestingly, around a fifth of the samples were delayed because, for a variety of reasons, the bench-top analyser was not immediately available.
This builds on the earlier study, performed at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (UK) and published in Critical Care, that evaluated the Proxima 3 miniature in-line blood gas analyser as part of a method comparison clinical study in the intensive care setting. Over 300 assessments – including the usual pH, pCO2, pO2, haematocrit and electrolytes – were made in 20 patients comparing Proxima and the reference Roche Cobas b221 bench top analyser. These results showed excellent correlation at both the collective and individual sample level, with the authors stating there was unequivocal agreement. Additionally, the staff found the system easy to use in practice, with clear benefits apparent within a short time.
Sphere Medical appointed Burke & Burke as exclusive distributors for Italy in July 2016, with launch stocks of the Proxima 4 system delivered in late December. The exclusive distributor for Spain, Proyectos Hospitalarios Internacional (Prhoinsa), was appointed in December 2016 and remains on track to launch in Q217. Additional regional partners are expected to be confirmed during the year, with a target of having a sales presence that addresses 60% of the European Union by end-17. The key priority is the securing of a network of local partners that are committed and capable of maximising the commercial potential of Proxima 4.
A full scale production site has been established in St. Asaph, Wales, and is fully approved and operational. In the near term there is no requirement for material capital expenditure, with this only likely to be required when volumes increase significantly. Once fully commissioned, it is expected the site should have sufficient capacity to manufacture all of Proxima’s forecast needs for the near- and medium-term. The pilot manufacturing line operating in a dedicated clean room at the Harston site remains available, offering the capacity to build sensor array assemblies and disposables if required.
We last updated our model when the CE Mark effectively removed regulatory risk from our investment case. Our valuation remains unchanged on these results at £30.2m (equivalent to 21.3p a share). We value Sphere Medical using a three-phase DCF model, assuming a discount rate of 10%, terminal growth of 2% and a long-term tax rate of 20% (not reflecting the potential benefits of the Patent Box incentives). We also ascribe an 80% probability of success to the Proxima cash flows (previously 60%, which included regulatory risk) to take into account the commercialisation risk until additional distributors are appointed. The breakdown of our valuation is shown in Exhibit 2 overleaf.
In modelling our sales adoption for Proxima 4 (and Proxima 4+ from 2018), we have taken note that the sales cycles for such products tends to be around 9 to 12 months, as equipment that can change clinical practice usually has longer assessment periods, which means meaningful revenue is not expected to flow through until 2018. We estimate the sensor, calibration solutions and flushes are priced at £200 and the monitor and stand are effectively leased out for a nominal sum. Such pricing suggests that if a patient is expected to need around 8-10 blood gas measurements per day then the Proxima systems should become cost-effective and effectively defines the target population.
We have adopted conservative assumptions throughout in our modelling; for instance, the valuation includes only the sales for use in the critical care settings, with no value assigned to its possible use in other settings, neither does it consider the inherent value of the technology platform. We feel this is currently appropriate as Sphere Medical has yet to demonstrate successful execution of its commercialisation strategy; however, as visibility improves we envisage employing less cautious assumptions.
Notably, we also ascribe no value to potential cash flows from other markets such as the US and Japan (or even RoW markets that recognise CE Marking) at present until such times as the company confirms its strategy for these key regions. Clearly as progress is achieved, we would expect to revisit the model and anticipate the valuation would reflect this.
The loss after tax for FY16 was £4.5m (£5.5m in FY15), with a loss per share of 3.2p (4.8p in FY15). Revenues for the year remained small, but doubled from £15,000 to £30,000. Despite the preparations for Proxima 4’s commercialisation, operating expenses before amortisation were kept below budget at £5.1m (£8.1m in FY15). Selling and marketing costs rose to £1.3m (from £1.0m), with production overheads up to £1.4m (from £1.3m). Administrative expenses reduced to £1.7m (from £2.2m). Reflecting the rising visibility, product development costs of £0.7m (£1.7m in FY15) were expensed and, following accounting practice, £2.1m (£0.9m in FY15) was capitalised. Net finance income of £72,000 (£91,000 in FY15) represented income on the cash deposits. The R&D tax credit was £0.6m, the same as in FY15.
The cash out-flow from operating activities was £4.5m (from £5.1m in FY15). Cash and cash equivalents were £3.2m at December 2016, down from £10.0m the previous year-end.
Our forecasts for FY16 are shown in Exhibit 5, and the changes are detailed in Exhibit 4.
In January 2017 a £3.0m loan facility from Silicon Valley Bank was established, being repayable by 2020. An initial £1.5m was drawn down at the time, with a further £1.5m conditionally available until March 2018. We remind that we estimate that Sphere Medical will likely have an additional funding requirement of £7-8m during 2017, which is shown as short term debt for the purposes of our forecasts.
Disclaimer
Trinity Delta Research Limited (“TDRL”; firm reference number: 725161), which trades as Trinity Delta, is an appointed representative of Equity Development Limited (“ED”). The contents of this report, which has been prepared by and is the sole responsibility of TDRL, have been reviewed, but not independently verified, by ED which is authorised and regulated by the FCA, and whose reference number is 185325.
ED is acting for TDRL and not for any other person and will not be responsible for providing the protections provided to clients of TDRL nor for advising any other person in connection with the contents of this report and, except to the extent required by applicable law, including the rules of the FCA, owes no duty of care to any other such person. No reliance may be placed on ED for advice or recommendations with respect to the contents of this report and, to the extent it may do so under applicable law, ED makes no representation or warranty to the persons reading this report with regards to the information contained in it.
In the preparation of this report TDRL has used publically available sources and taken reasonable efforts to ensure that the facts stated herein are clear, fair and not misleading, but make no guarantee or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained herein, nor to provide updates should fresh information become available or opinions change.
Any person who is not a relevant person under section of Section 21(2) of the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom should not act or rely on this document or any of its contents. Research on its client companies produced by TDRL is normally commissioned and paid for by those companies themselves (‘issuer financed research’) and as such is not deemed to be independent, as defined by the FCA, but is ‘objective’ in that the authors are stating their own opinions. The report should be considered a marketing communication for purposes of the FCA rules. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. TDRL does not hold any positions in any of the companies mentioned in the report, although directors, employees or consultants of TDRL may hold positions in the companies mentioned. TDRL does impose restrictions on personal dealings. TDRL might also provide services to companies mentioned or solicit business from them.
This report is being provided to relevant persons to provide background information about the subject matter of the note. This document does not constitute, nor form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale or purchase of (or solicitation of, or invitation to make any offer to buy or sell) any Securities (which may rise and fall in value). Nor shall it, or any part of it, form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. The information that we provide is not intended to be, and should not in any manner whatsoever be, construed as personalised advice. Self-certification by investors can be completed free of charge at www.fisma.org. TDRL, its affiliates, officers, directors and employees, and ED will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from any use of this document, to the maximum extent that the law permits.
Copyright 2017 Trinity Delta Research Limited. All rights reserved.